
Friday, July 31, 2009
Unit 5 Final

Thursday, July 30, 2009
Unit 5 First Draft

Again, my aim is to assist Registered Nurses in the hospital identify changes in their patients with respiratory acidosis. This tool organizes the identifies a process in the patient assessment without numbers but uses top down, left to right alignment pg. 128-133. I have chunked the information in 4 large chunks and not more than 7 content chunks, pg. 125 states that these are within the 0ptimun limits for learners. I have used clip-art with color to create learner appeal pg 265 for better visual cues of the process. I also felt that the information was better designed in a table format rather than a concept map as I wanted to emphasize the "steps" or process rather than the interaction of the information page 133. Even though the values for pH, PaCO2 and HCO3 are not words, I placed those chemical notations before the values so that the learners would be able to refer to the values pg. 139, and also I added the arrows so that the nurse who did not remember the normal values would know that the value was greater than or less than and could utilize that information to diagnose the patients underlying condition.
Please let me know if this is organized and if you are able to follow the process. Should I use numbers or arrows to send the learner to the next process? And finally do I need to use bold? Thank you very much for your feedback
Monday, July 27, 2009
Sunday, July 26, 2009
Unit 4 Final

Wednesday, July 22, 2009
Unit 4 First


Sunday, July 19, 2009
ABG Lab Interpretation Tool

The learner is a Registered Nurse who is a staff nurse in a hospital. The individual has completed at least 2 years of schooling and passed a licensure exam. This individual has completed basic knowledge of pathophysiology which is adequate to understand acidosis and alkalosis.
Justification:
The usability feedback told me to explain the tool more and to chunk the information. This final I believe does both of these even though my target audience will be more familiar with the content than the usability team. The information is valuable. The training tool presents information to the nurse on the fundamental concepts of interpreting an individual patient’s laboratory values. I revised the tool by using two distinct types of content, a pneumonic and a visual for this learning style. This also employs the repeated aspect of CARP where the information creates perceptual association. The other design elements related to CARP are:
· Contrasted relevant information, with the use of Bold and color.
· Aligned information sequentially.
· Repeated color to emphasize the concept as well as visualized the concept.
· Approximated the content with the boxes denoting like information and chunking the information.
I changed the type to Georgia the book on page 220 says it is “typeface designed for the web”. This final tool is much revised from the original and I believe easier to read than the first revision, repeating the concept with visual, contrasting color and bold, aligning the tool within the picture and within content as well as chunking the information for ease in identification all contribute to an effective tool.
Thursday, July 16, 2009
Usability Unit 3
The learner is a Registered Nurse who is a staff nurse in a hospital. The individual has completed at least 2 years of advanced schooling and passed a licensure exam. This individual has completed basic knowledge of pathophysiology which is adequate to understand acidosis and alkalosis.
Arterial blood gas (ABG) values provide valuable information about a patient’s acid-base status, the underlying cause of the imbalance, the body’s ability to regulate pH, and the patient’s overall oxygen status. Diagnosis of acid-base disturbances and identification of compensatory processes are done by reviewing and understanding the patient’s laboratory values.
Justification:
The presentations here are training tools that present information to the nurse on the fundamental concepts of interpreting an individual patient’s laboratory values. Both tools allow the nurse to determine the patient’s acid-base status. The first tool I found to be wordy and the instructions hard to follow. I revised the tool by using a pneumonic that I have found helpful. The second tool is designed based on CARP.
· Contrasted relevant information, with the use of Bold and color.
· Aligned information sequentially.
· Repeated color to emphasize the concept.
· Approximated the content with the boxes denoting like information and chunking the information.
I changed the type to Garamond which I had never used before. The book on page 217 says it is “very easy to read”. I did this because I found the type in the original tool hard to read. I right justified the content in the revised picture based on information from Unit 2.
Sunday, July 12, 2009
Second Version of Project Unit 2
